data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/06025/06025998a037f498bd2a5cdb027f368484acee0a" alt="Henning Meyer"
Henning Meyer
Pavlina Tcherneva tweeted two graphs from her research that were also picked up by Vox.com. The graphs answer a simple question: Who actually got what share of growing national income in different periods of time? Here is the answer for the US:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/354ad/354ad5c4f59cbfba09a106bb054ee1ed98a50f5d" alt="p1"
Is there any question that there is something fundamentally wrong with this distribution? And if you think this is only the case in the US look at the equivalent graph for Sweden:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4dc4b/4dc4b4c989f429eac3a95332b7f0406fa88f135d" alt="p2"
Something is going seriously wrong here! If you look at one graph that tells you all you need to know about income inequality look at who actually takes home the gains of economic growth.
No comments:
Post a Comment